The great LJ strikeout
May. 30th, 2007 10:28 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Hmm. I've read some posts, and I'm still amazed. No offense to those of you who believed this would happen, but when I saw the rumours, I seriously thought There is no way this is going to happen. And then it did. I'm gobsmacked.
The thing is, I'm really sad about this because I LOVE LJ. I don't like the way they've responded to this, but I'm still crossing my fingers that they'll do right by the people who were illegitimately affected, ie FANDOM.
I'm a permanent account holder, and the last time there was an LJ scare (the Vox controversy, I believe) it all blew over. This is, to my mind, a bit more serious, because it involves CENSORSHIP, which to a writer and librarian is a dirty word.
I'm still hoping this will blow over with little in the way of wreckage.
But just in case, I've had http://innerslytherin.greatestjournal.com/ for ages now and never used it. This seems like a good time to let y'all know where to find me, if it becomes necessary.
*sigh*
I'm going to go bury myself in my RPG LJ now and hope it doesn't get deleted because the character is a bisexual and that might offend someone.
The thing is, I'm really sad about this because I LOVE LJ. I don't like the way they've responded to this, but I'm still crossing my fingers that they'll do right by the people who were illegitimately affected, ie FANDOM.
I'm a permanent account holder, and the last time there was an LJ scare (the Vox controversy, I believe) it all blew over. This is, to my mind, a bit more serious, because it involves CENSORSHIP, which to a writer and librarian is a dirty word.
I'm still hoping this will blow over with little in the way of wreckage.
But just in case, I've had http://innerslytherin.greatestjournal.com/ for ages now and never used it. This seems like a good time to let y'all know where to find me, if it becomes necessary.
*sigh*
I'm going to go bury myself in my RPG LJ now and hope it doesn't get deleted because the character is a bisexual and that might offend someone.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 03:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 03:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 03:33 am (UTC)That was me. *g*
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 03:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 03:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 03:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 04:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 04:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 04:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 04:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 03:51 am (UTC)Incidentally, I am not surprised the the above two would be targeted. Not really the smartest things to rally around, especially the pedo one since the internet is a gathering place for real crime rings of that sort. I'd feel weird putting that as an interest even if it was a fictional interest between to fictional characters that have an age difference. In the real world it isn't a 'fandom word' and it means obviously terrible things. It would be like putting 'kkk' as an interest when you might just be a historian researching the subject. Someone looking in would think of something entirely different. Anyway, as long as "stealing spaceships" doesn't get me in trouble I should be fine with my interests.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 04:21 am (UTC)One foreign language group discussing the literary merits of Lolita was deleted as well...
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 04:30 am (UTC)I mean, obviously I don't support incest or pedophilia, but the way LJ handled the matter was like a bull in a china shop. And that's what has me upset.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 04:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 04:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 05:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 06:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 11:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 12:04 pm (UTC)